Personally, when I see this case, I find the patent to be extremely vague with regards to what it is (Don't remember the exact wording -- anyone got a source?
Page 1 of 1
Microsoft Word 2007 and i4i
#1
Posted 23 September 2009 - 09:20 PM
There's been a lot of news with regards to the use of XML encoding for Word 2007 files, that's apparently vaguely patented by i4i. I'm interested to see some further opinion on this issue.
Personally, when I see this case, I find the patent to be extremely vague with regards to what it is (Don't remember the exact wording -- anyone got a source?
) and Microsoft isn't the only company implementing such a feature. i4i claims that they don't want MS Word to be pushed off the market, and obviously isn't likely to happen either due to Microsoft Word being a core MS product, and the dependency of many companies on this product (Plus everyone would be really pissed at i4i) and does no particular gain to i4i in general. Another sue happy for $$$ company, if I was the judge I would have told them to STFU and throw them out of court already.
Personally, when I see this case, I find the patent to be extremely vague with regards to what it is (Don't remember the exact wording -- anyone got a source?
#2
Posted 24 September 2009 - 12:27 AM
Yep, but the big thing is that it seems that using XML on a website violates the patent.
#3
Posted 24 September 2009 - 07:14 AM
Ahh I found the document: http://blog.seattlep...4icomplaint.pdf
Personally I found the .*x format excellent. It's also literally half the size for anything you get in normal Office formats.
But yeah, they should sue every website as well, and OpenOffice
Personally I found the .*x format excellent. It's also literally half the size for anything you get in normal Office formats.
But yeah, they should sue every website as well, and OpenOffice
#4
Posted 25 September 2009 - 10:04 PM
This is a good example of where patents have gone too far - patents itself are to protect inventors not completely vague definitions that somehow got approved for sue happy america. You can see that they always sue these kind of case in Texas because thats the only court that wont throw you out for stupid **** like this. I don't see Microsoft doing anything wrong in particular.
#5
Posted 25 September 2009 - 11:17 PM
Patent sitting is the lamest thing ever. Doing this makes innovations, well less innovative or non-existent.
#6
Posted 27 September 2009 - 02:05 PM
I agree with you on those points. For the fact that patents are to protect innovation in the first place, companies turn around and do patent sitting as a business, as seen here. Vague patents like this simply reduces innovation as Kenneth said -- it's hard to make anything new without some guy down the street with some uber vague patent going like OMG YOU STOLE MY STUFFS!!! when in reality the guy probably never even thought of this in the first place.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1

Help











