APH Networks | community: Shaw hangs up plans to become cellphone carrier - APH Networks | community

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Shaw hangs up plans to become cellphone carrier

#1 User is offline   shc-boomer 

  • News Director
  • Group: Staff Team
  • Posts: 11,089
  • Joined: 24-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver, BC, Canada

Posted 01 September 2011 - 10:05 AM

http://www.calgaryhe...9206/story.html

Quote

Shaw Communications has pulled the plug on expanding into an increasingly crowded cellphone market, citing cost and the number of players already there.

The long-awaited decision comes after months of delays while the Calgary-based cable giant considered its options and the rapidly evolving technology.

“We have decided to focus on strengthening our core business and leveraging our media and programming assets to support our leadership position in broadband and video,” Shaw CEO Brad Shaw stated in a release. “Our decision not to pursue a conventional wireless business is consistent with this strategic approach and our focus on shareholder value.”

Instead, Shaw says it will concentrate on a Wi-Fi network that “will allow our customers to extend their Shaw services beyond the home. This will achieve our objectives without risking well over $1 billion in capital expenditures on a traditional wireless network build.”

Shaw bought room on the country’s cellphone spectrum during the last auction, but first delayed its entrance into the market in January, when they also lost their head of wireless. In April, the company halted moving forward while it reviewed the technology available, including LTE.

At the time analysts worried that would leave the TV and Internet provider further behind competitors already gaining market share in its core businesses.

Telus, for example, has been eating into Shaw’s subscriber base, in part because of promotions afforded by the money it makes from its cellphone arm.

Analysts felt Shaw had a number of options at that point, none with a clear advantage. Those included abandoning plans to add the service, partnering with an existing network provider and the expensive choice of going it alone.

Not proceeding with plans to become a wireless carrier left the company more vulnerable to Telus, some believed.

“When we first started looking at the wireless opportunity we saw wireless as a complementary product in a world where broadband Internet access is moving increasingly to wireless devices (smartphones, tablets, laptops, netbooks, etc.),” the company said in its Thursday morning release. “However, the economics of a conventional wireless business as a new entrant are extremely challenging.

“New entrants lack the economies of scale and scope to compete effectively against well-established incumbents with ubiquitous coverage, extensive device ecosystems, deep spectrum positions and large retail networks. Even with our established base and considerable strengths and assets, we could not justify a wireless network build at this time.”

Concentrating on Wi-Fi, Shaw said, takes advantage of all the devices customers now use, pointing out that major wireless carriers now off-load their traffic to Wi-Fi when possible.

“Given that Wi-Fi spectrum is free and there are no device subsidies, we can build extensive Wi-Fi coverage at a substantially lower cost relative to a traditional wireless network and still provide our customers with an excellent broadband wireless experience.”

Company executives will speak to analysts about their decision this morning.

Posted Image

#2 User is offline   chconline 

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Group: Executive Staff Team
  • Posts: 26,199
  • Joined: 22-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta

Posted 01 September 2011 - 11:58 AM

Darn, I would go with Shaw if they ever entered the cell phone market.

That said, in the article it mentions about how they've been losing money to Telus. Well, I for one know quite a few people who switched to Telus because of vastly competitive rates, and Shaw's reluctance to make any customer retention efforts. Telus would go great lengths to retain a customer (Like Rogers customer retention plans). Shaw doesn't give a crap if you leave, even though you've been a longtime loyal customer. They have great conquest rates for the first 6 months or whatever, but what they don't understand is it's better and much cheaper to retain a customer than to gain new customers.

That said, why am I still with Shaw? Better and more reliable service. Just ask Preston :lol:
Posted Image

#3 User is offline   Big Bang 

  • APH Platinum
  • Group: +Subscriber
  • Posts: 2,982
  • Joined: 30-October 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 02 September 2011 - 10:38 AM

Cable company into Cell Phones? :lol:
Posted Image
Camaro SS FTW
0

#4 User is offline   TL6MT 

  • I drive an Acura TL SH-AWD 6MT
  • Group: +Subscriber
  • Posts: 3,329
  • Joined: 16-June 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles

Posted 03 September 2011 - 10:10 AM

City-wide WiFi network?
Posted Image
0

#5 User is offline   chconline 

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Group: Executive Staff Team
  • Posts: 26,199
  • Joined: 22-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta

Posted 04 September 2011 - 09:27 PM

Yeah, I'll be interested to see how they are going to deploy that too. So if we are already a subscriber, do we get discount WiFi?
Posted Image

#6 User is offline   Big Bang 

  • APH Platinum
  • Group: +Subscriber
  • Posts: 2,982
  • Joined: 30-October 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 06 September 2011 - 08:44 AM

View PostTL6MT, on 03 September 2011 - 10:10 AM, said:

City-wide WiFi network?

That's an ambitious plan.
Posted Image
Camaro SS FTW
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic