APH Networks | community: AMD Not Competing with Intel Anymore, Goes Mobile - APH Networks | community

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

AMD Not Competing with Intel Anymore, Goes Mobile

#1 User is offline   chconline 

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Group: Executive Staff Team
  • Posts: 26,199
  • Joined: 22-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta

Posted 29 November 2011 - 12:53 PM

Quote

In a move than could very well be interpreted as exchanging one problem for another, Advanced Micro Devices has decided to stop focusing so much on the PC business and get its act closer together on the mobile front.

The Bulldozer disaster, as it is known in some circles, must have persuaded AMD's leadership that the PC side of their business wasn't flying very well and far anymore.

Though everyone was expecting much from 8-core processors, the performance was, in the end, well lower than some of AMD's own previous-generation chips.

Whether because of this or something else, it was reported that Advanced Micro Devices has chosen to distance itself from its competition with Intel.

That is to say, it will focus less on processors for PCs and pay more attention to the mobile market.

As such, it will probably start to customize its Fusion platform in such a way as to create tablet and smartphone chips.

"We're at an inflection point," said AMD spokesman Mike Silverman, according to a Mercury News report. "We will all need to let go of the old 'AMD versus Intel' mindset, because it won't be about that anymore."

If anything, 2011, with more than half a year of lacking an actual CEO, was a clear symptom that Advanced Micro Devices had to do something, and soon.

The company has a new leader now and, sure enough, the man took some fairly drastic measures, and that includes more than this latest change in direction, as well as a branded RAM project.

The workforce also suffered, especially the PR and marketing departments (AMD axed large portions of each as part of its plan to cut total worldwide employee count by 10%).

The complicated thing about the focus on mobile is that ARM already has that well enough in hand, and NVIDIA just launched the Kal-El too. AMD may just be exchanging one headache for another with this.


http://news.softpedi...le-237103.shtml

Looks like Intel now has a monopoly. That's not good news.
Posted Image

#2 User is offline   ZLS 

  • Advanced Member
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 43
  • Joined: 04-October 11

Posted 30 November 2011 - 08:23 PM

Yeah, in my opinion, the only winning platform that AMD has is Fusion. The E350 and C50 APUs are actually pretty decent; better than Intel's Atom chips, that's for sure. However, on the desktop processor front, Intel really has a lead in performance, power efficiency, and overall architecture. I don't really want to see a monopoly in place, but unless AMD really drops the prices on their chips, I don't see much else happening in the near future. If their 8-core chips were like $160-180, then yeah, I think they would be doing a lot better. I would be willing to purchase one at that price, but not any more than that.

This post has been edited by ZLS: 30 November 2011 - 08:24 PM

0

#3 User is offline   TL6MT 

  • I drive an Acura TL SH-AWD 6MT
  • Group: +Subscriber
  • Posts: 3,329
  • Joined: 16-June 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Los Angeles

Posted 01 December 2011 - 10:29 PM

I guess they are "focusing" on the mobile market doesnt mean they're pulling out completely, there's only hope.
Posted Image
0

#4 User is offline   Big Bang 

  • APH Platinum
  • Group: +Subscriber
  • Posts: 2,982
  • Joined: 30-October 06
  • Gender:Male

Posted 03 December 2011 - 11:19 PM

Thats too bad that Bulldozer is a failure. overpromssing and underdelivering after 2-3 years is quite a bad hit to get. I miss the Athlon 64 days.
Posted Image
Camaro SS FTW
0

#5 User is offline   chconline 

  • Editor-in-Chief
  • Group: Executive Staff Team
  • Posts: 26,199
  • Joined: 22-October 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, Alberta

Posted 05 December 2011 - 04:57 PM

I don't think price is the only issue right now. AMD has always been about undercutting Intel in price, but their performance is really crappy -- not to mention high heat outputs. There is really no reason to buy AMD over Intel at this point, considering how little percentage the difference in cost on the grand scale of things.
Posted Image

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic