Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Chewmen_ldr

  • Rank
    APH Member
  • Birthday 08/02/1990

Profile Information

  • Location
  1. Crap. Nothing but complete crap. You want to say Jesus had kin, you can do it if you want to. Just don't try to prove it. You might as well try to scientifically prove that God is real, because no one will believe you. And even if He somehow did have a child, it is completely irrelevant to the Atonement of Jesus the Christ. It's like finding out how to lick your elbow five minutes from your death.
  2. You know what? I can't stand people who are lifted up in the pride of themselves.
  3. Christian, but more precisely, a Latter-Day Saint (Mormon).
  4. I know of four or five 711's in Edmonton off the top of my head. Ontario is weird. I actually don't think I have gone any one month without a slurpee.
  5. That has absolutely nothing to do with what I said. Fads come and go. In order to subjectively judge something, you have to remove these paradigms as a mean of judgement. 1969 Hemi's and Dodge Chargers are definitely not called crappy designs because they are not the style of today, and not considered antiques either. Fashion is in its own category. Fashion will never stand any test of time. Now Houses are a lot like computer graphics. Apparently you have came to the conclusion that 2006 has one main template for all of the Internet. Based on what? Three different tech sites displaying the same type of images? I would not call that a trend. Neither would I call chrome door knobs in one place of the world a trend. House design is based on personal preference, and personal preference definitely doesn't follow a general rule that changes as often as the clock. I would agree with an idea of trends being formed over eras, but not each year. You never know though, maybe there is a website that tells you what is considered good design in 2006. But even if there was, I wouldn't care. And before you say something like "whatever, I don't have to explain myself", consider that I'm debating with you, not arguing. So try to convince me, not bore me, please. EDIT: Oh, one more thing. The reason I'm picking on this even though you said "still pretty good if trends arent considered" is because the first thing you said was indirectly saying it was bad by 2006 standards. Your first impression matters more than some amending-cliche.
  6. Sorry... I just have to pick on this chc... What exactly is 2006ish, and since when do trends hold any bars upon whether something is good or not? Styles should not be judged on whether it is "in" or not, but whether it could stand the test of time.
  7. I probably meant "I'm amazed you don't like it." towards the multiple people who didn't like it.
  8. Spiderman 2 was raved by critics around the world. I'm amazed you don't like it. I thought it was great. Kirsten Dunst and Tobey Maguire are going to be in every Spiderman movie. Sheesh. Why would they change actors? That would be as successful as Home Alone 3.
  9. chc, you have become one offtopic poster. Very unlike me, that is. Oh, and that was hilarious for my heart will go on.
  10. Here's a song for you. My Heart Will Go On (Love Theme From 'Titanic') Every night in my dreams I see you. I feel you. That is how I know you go on. Far across the distance And spaces between us You have come to show you go on. Near, far, wherever you are I believe that the heart does go on Once more you open the door And you're here in my heart And my heart will go on and on Love can touch us one time And last for a lifetime And never let go till we're gone Love was when I loved you One true time I hold to In my life we'll always go on Near, far, wherever you are I believe that the heart does go on Once more you open the door And you're here in my heart And my heart will go on and on There is some love that will not go away You're here, there's nothing I fear, And I know that my heart will go on We'll stay forever this way You are safe in my heart And my heart will go on and on
  11. Oh and to get some closure on this music stuff... Ty is wrong, chc is wrong, and aj is most wrong. I am right. Coldplay rules. Goodnight.
  12. My problem on this question had nothing to do with radian. BUT MY TEST SURE DID!
  13. AHAH! I figured out my problem on the bus. I used 190 as the velocity in the x direction. y component: d = 0m a = - 9.81m/(s/s) Vi = 290sin37 -> 174.53 m/s Vf = - 274.53 m/s t = ? Vf - Vi a = t t = 35.5 x component: d = ? v = 290cos37 -> 232 t = 35.5 d = 232 * 35.5 = 8.24 * 10^3 Thanks for the help. Oh, and I posted this on edmontonoilers.com and nobody answered the question. Oh no. I just realized I left my calculator in radian mode when I did my test. OH NO!!!
  • Create New...