Crucial P1 500GB Review (Page 5 of 11)

Page 5 - Benchmark: Crystal Disk Mark 6.0

About Crystal Disk Mark

- Seq Q32T1: Sequential (Block Size=128KiB) Read/Write with 32 queues & 1 thread
- 4K Q8T8: Random 4KiB Read/Write with 8 queues & 8 threads
- 4K Q32T1: Random 4KiB Read/Write with 32 queues & 1 thread
- 4K Q1T1: Random 4KiB Read/Write with 1 queue & 1 thread
- Select test data (Random, 0Fill)

From: Developer's Page

As for this review, we updated our Crystal Disk Mark benchmark to version 6.0. However, the results are not compatible with the older version 3.0 we have tested with in the past, so we have to restart our graph results. Looking at the sequential read and write results, this Crucial P1 500GB is the slowest of the three, though this should come to no surprise. This follows a similar trend with the rest of the results and the P1 500GB even closed the gap with slightly higher numbers in the 4K tests. Otherwise, you can see the dominant display of the WD Black NVMe SSD 1TB, which is more a testament to its great performance numbers rather than the ones from the P1. However, we will continue to see more drives on this graph in the future, so we can get better relative results.

Page Index
1. Introduction, Packaging, Specifications
2. A Closer Look, Test System
3. Benchmark: AIDA64 Disk Benchmark
4. Benchmark: ATTO Disk Benchmark
5. Benchmark: Crystal Disk Mark 6.0
6. Benchmark: HD Tach
7. Benchmark: HD Tune Pro 4.60
8. Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 9.0
9. Benchmark: PCMark Vantage
10. Benchmark: PCMark 8
11. Conclusion