Crucial CT2K16G48C40U5 DDR5-4800 2x16GB Review (Page 4 of 10)

Page 4 - Benchmark: AIDA64 FPU

About AIDA64 Engineer

AIDA64 Engineer has a hardware detection engine unrivaled in its class. It provides detailed information about installed software and offers diagnostic functions and support for overclocking. As it is monitoring sensors in real time, it can gather accurate voltage, temperature and fan speed readings, while its diagnostic functions help detect and prevent hardware issues. It also offers a couple of benchmarks for measuring the performance of individual hardware components or the whole system. It is compatible with all 32-bit and 64-bit Windows editions, including Windows 11 and Windows Server 2022.

From: Developer's Page





Usually, AIDA64's FPU benchmarks are the least exciting of all when writing a RAM review. This is because the way results are obtained is usually highly dependent on the tested processor; so much to an extent that the outcome is typically irrelevant to the speed or latencies of the installed memory modules. As you can see in our graphs above, all the results were within a hair of each other with the exception of the FP32 RT and FP64 RT tests. In the FP32 RT test, the CT2K16G48C40U5 was 10.7% faster than the Viper Venom RGB. Strangely enough, it seems the slower the RAM, the higher the score. In the FP64 RT test, there was a relatively wider gap compared to the first three results, but the difference was only 3.7% in favor of the CT2K16G48C40U5 compared to the lowest scored FURY Beast. At the end of the day, they were almost all within the same ballpark as each other.


Page Index
1. Introduction, Packaging, Specifications
2. A Closer Look, Test System
3. Benchmark: AIDA64 CPU
4. Benchmark: AIDA64 FPU
5. Benchmark: AIDA64 Memory
6. Benchmark: PCMark 10
7. Benchmark: 3DMark
8. Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 10
9. Benchmark: SuperPI 1M, Cinebench R23
10. Overclocking and Conclusion