Page 5 - Conclusion
After our tests and inspection of the Yeyian Sigurd Series 2503, I can say this is a very acceptable monitor for the general consumer. Its high-refresh rate and pixel density are in a good spot for gamers too. Its large screen size is bright and provides all the necessary connections, including both HDMI and DisplayPort. I also appreciate its flexible VESA mounting capabilities. I do somewhat question the need for a curved screen at this size and resolution, but it provides a bit more of an immersive experience, at least in perception. In terms of performance, the Sigurd 2503 has some good things going for it. After calibration, the screen is generally accurate and it offers a better contrast ratio than most IPS monitors, which would be favorable for content consumption. However, there are also flaws to point out. For one, it should not be used for color-sensitive work, as it has a lower gamut coverage and poor display uniformity, while the factory calibration is noticeably different from our post-calibration profile. Its viewing angles are acceptable for a VA panel, but there is some color shifting. Finally, there is notable backlight bleeding that will get distracting in darker scenes or images. In everyday use, there are other less desirable aspects of the Sigurd Series 2503. For one, its stand is wobbly and does not provide any meaningful adjustments. Its integrated speakers are abhorrent and should not be used. Finally, the on-screen display menu is difficult to navigate with the behind-the-screen buttons that have an unintuitive layout. At the time of this article, the Yeyian Sigurd Series 2503 has an MSRP of $170, but can be found at your favorite retailer for less. At this price point, I think there could still be improvements overall, but the monitor is a relatively affordable curved screen for gaming or office use.
Yeyian provided this product to APH Networks for the purpose of evaluation.
Page Index
1. Introduction, Packaging, Specifications
2. Physical Look - Hardware
3. OSD and Test System
4. Display Performance Tests
5. Conclusion
