Page 7 - Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 10
About PassMark PerformanceTest 10
This Advanced Disk Test, which is part of PerformanceTest, measures the data transfer speed when reading or writing data to one or more disks. The speed that data can be transferred between memory and a hard disk drive is one of a system's most important performance aspects. There are quite a few factors which have a bearing on this speed and the Advanced Disk Drive Test allows the user to vary most of these factors and compare the results.
The test supports any drive that can be mounted under Windows. Including IDE drives, SCSI, RAID, USB key drives, SATA, networked shared drives and external drives.
Users have the ability to test multiple drives at the same time using multiple threads, and specify:
- The size of the test file used. Larger files mean that the system cache has less of an effect on the test types, which use caching (see below).
- The size of the data block used for each read or write request. Larger blocks mean less requests and can lead to an improvement in performance.
- The choice of four access methods - C/C++ API, Win32 API cached / uncached and raw disk access.
- Sequential or random access (seeking plus reading and writing)
- Synchronous and Asynchronous access
- The split between reading and writing
The results of all completed tests may be graphed using our custom graphing components.
From: Developer's Page
PassMark PerformanceTest 10's Advanced Disk Test, unlike HD Tune Pro 5.70, generates some awesome graphs right out of the box. It also provides valuable insight in simulating real-world performance applications. To make things clear to you, the first graph simulates a database server, followed by a file server, web server, and workstation. Obviously, PassMark PerformanceTest 10 uses highly compressible data in most tests some controllers can really take advantage of. However, it also requires high IOPS capabilities for the best score.
The Lexar NM710 1TB continued showing underwhelming performance here. The results were 113.24MB/s, 1116MB/s, 1840MB/s, and 211.74MB/s respectively. The Netac NV7000-t 1TB with the same controller posted 131.61MB/s, 1008MB/s, 3218MB/s, and 241.28MB/s, respectively. Unfortunately, these numbers fell significantly behind the WD_BLACK SN770 1TB in every category, with the SN770 1TB -- another budget DRAM-less SSD -- posting results at 366.45MB/s, 2716MB/s, 2915MB/s, 300.29MB/s, in the same order. The NM710 1TB scored closer to the Crucial P3 Plus 1TB, which scored at 267.34MB/s, 1986MB/s, 2044MB/s, and 253.39MB/s, respectively, although there is still a measurable performance gap. The DRAM-less Corsair MP600 Core XT 2TB came in at 255.02MB/s, 1808MB/s, 1840MB/s, and 255.77MB/s. Another DRAM-less drive, the XPG Atom 50 1TB, posted results of 32.46MB/s, 519.21MB/s, 2095MB/s, and 210.09MB/s, which the Lexar NM710 1TB beat out in each category with the exception of the web server test. That one was not hard to beat though. The NM710 1TB also beat out the Patriot P400 1TB, another budget drive that scored at 34.04MB/s, 543.30MB/s, 1493MB/s, and 198.25MB/s, respectively.
Page Index
1. Introduction, Packaging, Specifications
2. A Closer Look, Test System
3. Benchmark: AIDA64 Disk Benchmark
4. Benchmark: ATTO Disk Benchmark
5. Benchmark: Crystal Disk Mark 8.0
6. Benchmark: HD Tune Pro 5.70
7. Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 10
8. Benchmark: PCMark 10
9. Benchmark: 3DMark
10. Conclusion
