OCZ Trion 150 480GB Review (Page 5 of 11)

Page 5 - Benchmark: Crystal Disk Mark

About Crystal Disk Mark

- Measure sequential reads/writes speed
- Measure random 512KB, 4KB, 4KB (Queue Depth=32) reads/writes speed
- Select test data (Random, 0Fill, 1Fill)

From: Developer's Page

Crystal Disk Mark 3.0 is in the spotlight. Just a bit of background information; higher capacity drives tend to perform a little better in these tests. The ability of a controller and flash memory to deliver high IOPS will provide huge benefits to the score as well. The OCZ Trion 150 480GB is rated at 90,000 IOPS for read and 54,000 IOPS for write, which is the same as its predecessor. Looking at the results, there was definitely some pretty big changes. In the read tests, the OCZ Trion 150 480GB trailed the Trion 100 480GB slightly in the Sequential and 512K tests, and virtually tied its predecessor in the 4K QD32 section, but massively destroyed everyone else in the 4K section. In the write tests, the OCZ Trion 150GB was also a significant improvement. While it trailed the Trion 100 slightly once again in the Sequential test, the Trion 150 managed an impressive lead in the rest of the sections, making it rise from being one of the worst to one of the best in the value drive category. I will let you make your own comparisons in our massive list of SSDs in the graphs above.

Page Index
1. Introduction, Packaging, Specifications
2. A Closer Look, Test System
3. Benchmark: AIDA64 Disk Benchmark
4. Benchmark: ATTO Disk Benchmark
5. Benchmark: Crystal Disk Mark 3.0
6. Benchmark: HD Tach
7. Benchmark: HD Tune Pro 4.60
8. Benchmark: PassMark PerformanceTest 8.0
9. Benchmark: PCMark Vantage
10. Benchmark: PCMark 8
11. Conclusion