Netac ZX20L 512GB Review (Page 4 of 7)

Page 4 - Benchmark: ATTO Disk Benchmark

About ATTO Disk Benchmark

The ATTO Disk Benchmark performance measurement tool is compatible with Microsoft Windows. Measure your storage systems performance with various transfer sizes and test lengths for reads and writes. Several options are available to customize your performance measurement including queue depth, overlapped I/O and even a comparison mode with the option to run continuously. Use ATTO Disk Benchmark to test any manufacturers RAID controllers, storage controllers, host adapters, hard drives and SSD drives and notice that ATTO products will consistently provide the highest level of performance to your storage.

From: Developer's Page


Following up next are our usual ATTO read and write tests. ATTO is an often-quoted benchmark because it is easy to use and accurate. For the most part, it is a favorite among reviewers, and I have grown to embrace it as much as the next for the last little while. ATTO uses easily compressible data, so compression-heavy controllers will perform very well here.

As far as the Netac ZX20L 512GB is concerned, well, here are our results. It peaked at 1740MB/s read and 1500MB/s write. Under the curve, in the write test at small to medium transfer sizes up to 8K, it was basically the same as the ZX10 2TB. It was no match for the X10 Pro across the entire range, and was only slightly faster than the SE880, SL660, and Black P50 in the first two write sizes. In the read test, it was faster than the X10 Pro and SE880 until 32K, but could not keep up with the Black P50 and SL660 across the entire range. The ADATA SE920 1TB is USB4, so we did not expect the Netac ZX20L 512GB to hit those speeds. Overall, the Netac ZX20 512GB's performance was within the ballpark of other USB 3.2 Gen 2x2 class portable SSDs.


Page Index
1. Introduction, Packaging, Specifications
2. A Closer Look, Test System
3. Benchmark: AIDA64 Disk Benchmark
4. Benchmark: ATTO Disk Benchmark
5. Benchmark: Crystal Disk Mark 8.0
6. Benchmark: HD Tune Pro 5.70
7. Conclusion